ECSTATIC vs Sharks Preview and Predictions: CCT Online Finals #1

| Tags: | Author
ECSTATIC vs Sharks Preview and Predictions: CCT Online Finals #1

The matchup of Ecstatic vs Sharks will pit two rising teams from two different continents against each other, with the winner moving on to the Upper Bracket final 


It’s not every day that teams like ECSTATIC and Sharks get the chance to earn the kind of money on offer in CCT Online Finals #1, and it’s quite the incentive for such teams. ECSTATIC will try to keep their six win streak going as they face the Sharks, who have been giving their all in their past few matches. On the other hand, the Brazilians will look to preserve their own solid form to claim a rare piece of expensive silverware for the South American country. If you’re looking to indulge in CSGO betting, our preview is a must-read for you.

ECSTATIC

ECSTATIC continue to flex their CSGO chops as they look to take aim at Sharks for a spot in the Semifinals. They emerged victorious against BIG in their last match with a straight 2-0 sweep of BIG in their last match, winning 16-10 on Inferno after a strong showing on the CT-side before edging the Germans out on Nuke by the barest of margins in regulation play.

Players

Marcus “maNkz” Kjeldsen

  • HLTV Rating: 1.02
  • Impact Rating: 1.00
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 70.7%
  • Average Damage Round: 73.2
  • Kills Per Round: 0.64

Tobias “kraghen” Kragh Jensen

  • HLTV Rating: 1.03
  • Impact Rating: 1.03
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 69.5%
  • Average Damage Round: 76.6
  • Kills Per Round: 0.67

Jonas “Queenix” Dideriksen

  • HLTV Rating: 1.02
  • Impact Rating: 0.94
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 71.2%
  • Average Damage Round: 71.4
  • Kills Per Round: 0.64

Jason “salazar” Salazar

  • HLTV Rating: 1.04
  • Impact Rating: 0.96
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 71.5%
  • Average Damage Round: 66.4
  • Kills Per Round: 0.65

Magnus “Nodios” Olsen

  • HLTV Rating: 1.01
  • Impact Rating: 0.99
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 71.3%
  • Average Damage Round: 75.5
  • Kills Per Round: 0.68

Player To Watch

salazar

ecstatic vs sharks CCT online finals 1

Sharks

Sharks moved to the Semifinals after defeating the Endpoint 2-1. Despite losing the first map, Mirage, 13-16, they emerged victorious with significant score differences of 16-5 (Anubis) and 16-7 (Ancient) in the last two games to eke out a victory in the series. 

Players 

Richard “chay” Seidy

  • HLTV Rating: 1.10
  • Impact Rating: 1.16
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 71.3%
  • Average Damage Round: 79.1
  • Kills Per Round: 0.71

Rodrigo “drg” Ausenka

  • HLTV Rating: 1.00
  • Impact Rating: 0.94
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 70.1%
  • Average Damage Round: 71.0
  • Kills Per Round: 0.64

Victor “togs” Rapassi

  • HLTV Rating: 1.14
  • Impact Rating: 1.11
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 72.6%
  • Average Damage Round: 80.1
  • Kills Per Round: 0.74

Victor “Gafolo” Andrade

  • HLTV Rating: 1.08
  • Impact Rating: 1.04
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 70.6%
  • Average Damage Round: 70.4
  • Kills Per Round: 0.69

Daniel “rdnzao” Monteiro

  • HLTV Rating: 1.10
  • Impact Rating: 1.08
  • Kill/Assist/Survived/Traded: 72.2%
  • Average Damage Round: 76.7
  • Kills Per Round: 0.71

Player to Watch

Togs

ECSTATIC vs Sharks Predictions: CCT Online Finals #1

We expect ECSTATIC to beat Sharks 2-1.

ECSTATIC vs Sharks Head to Head Record 

ECSTATIC 0-0 Sharks

ECSTATIC vs Sharks Maps 

  • Vertigo
  • Ancient 
  • Anubis

Sharks vs ECSTATIC Score 

  • Map 1: Sharks to win by +4<
  • Map 2: ECSTATIC to win by +3<
  • Map 3: ECSTATIC to win by +4<

Sharks vs ECSTATIC Top Fragger

salazar

CCT Online Finals #1 ECSTATIC vs Sharks Match Links

ECSTATIC vs Sharks Match Time

May 29, 2023 – 08:30 ET/07:30 CST/05:30 PT

ECSTATIC vs Sharks Preview and Predictions: CCT Online Finals #1
The Old One
When he's not sighing at sub-standard teammates in Dota 2 and CS2, The Old One is writing about those two games (among other things). If you see his name around the site too many times for your liking, well, the guy just never stops writing. Yes, we've tried an intervention.